Polyamory.com Forum  

Go Back   Polyamory.com Forum > Polyamory > General Poly Discussions

Notices

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 04-25-2012, 03:59 AM
feelyunicorn feelyunicorn is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: Brazil
Posts: 151
Default Polyamory erasure

I see a parallel between bisexual erasure and the kinds of dismissals dished out at me when I say I have feelings for multiple people.

Bisexual erasure refers to the belief that bisexuals are either closeted gays, or an intermediary step toward homosexuality. A both coarser and subtler subvariant of erasure is the idea that bisexuals are simply slutty, needy, attention-whorish, and therefore unable to have committed relationships.

What I`ve noticed when I talk to monogamists is that they use the word 'relationship' to mean a monogamous relationship. Therefore, wanting to have multiple partners is tantamount to not wanting a relationship (or, anything 'serious' anyway), and simply an intermediary step doomed to be left behind once you find real love. Oh, you will see when it happens.

I`ve recently got this from my best friend, who`s gay, super-hyper sexually active, and yet an ideological monogamist. Have you encountered this mono-monopoly over the word 'relationship' often? How annoying is it?
__________________
Independent, sex-positive, bi-curious, private, atheist, elitist, athletic dude.

Last edited by feelyunicorn; 04-25-2012 at 04:03 AM.
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 04-25-2012, 04:10 PM
AutumnalTone AutumnalTone is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Kansas City Metro
Posts: 2,186
Default

Nope.

And, if I were, I'd likely offer the rejoinder that they'll probably eventually develop the capacity for true loving relationships when they meet "the Other One." Just wait and see.
__________________
When speaking of various forms of non-monogamy...it ain't poly if you're just fucking around.

While polyamory, open relationships, and swinging are all distinctly different approaches to non-monogamy, they are not mutually exlusive. Folks can, and some do, engage in more than one of them at a time--and it's all good.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 04-25-2012, 05:03 PM
feelyunicorn feelyunicorn is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: Brazil
Posts: 151
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by AutumnalTone View Post
Nope.

And, if I were, I'd likely offer the rejoinder that they'll probably eventually develop the capacity for true loving relationships when they meet "the Other One." Just wait and see.
I`m surprised. But, excellent comeback.
__________________
Independent, sex-positive, bi-curious, private, atheist, elitist, athletic dude.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 04-25-2012, 08:14 PM
CielDuMatin's Avatar
CielDuMatin CielDuMatin is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Upstate New York, USA
Posts: 1,456
Default

Yes, I have come across the view that a poly relationship can't be "real" - real can only be monogamy.

It goes along with the "so you're afraid of commitment" jibe. Once folks actually start seeing the details of our lives, they realize that we are actually more committed than a lot of monogamous couples are.... levels of commitment really have nothing to do with it.
__________________
Please check out The Birdcage - an open, friendly Polyamory forum for all parts of New York State
http://www.thebirdcage.org/

"Listen, or your tongue will make you deaf." - Native American Proverb
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 04-25-2012, 09:17 PM
kdt26417's Avatar
kdt26417 kdt26417 is offline
Official Greeter
 
Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: Olympia, Washington
Posts: 5,420
Default

Re (from feelyunicorn):
Quote:
"What I've noticed when I talk to monogamists is that they use the word 'relationship' to mean a monogamous relationship. Therefore, wanting to have multiple partners is tantamount to not wanting a relationship ..."
Oh man, isn't that the truth.

Re (from feelyunicorn):
Quote:
"Have you encountered this mono-monopoly over the word 'relationship' often? How annoying is it?"
On a scale of 1 to 10, it's about 7.75 annoying. I've encountered it in a lot of magazine articles, stuff like that. And just think, when two lovers ask each other, "Are we in a relationship?" ... what they really mean is (and everyone knows it), "Are we going to be romantically exclusive now?"

Re (from AutumnalTone):
Quote:
"I'd likely offer the rejoinder that they'll probably eventually develop the capacity for true loving relationships when they meet 'the Other One.' Just wait and see."
LOL ...

Re (from CielDuMatin):
Quote:
"It goes along with the 'so you're afraid of commitment' jibe."
It sure does.
__________________
Love means never having to say, "Put down that meat cleaver!"
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 04-26-2012, 12:56 AM
ThatGirlInGray ThatGirlInGray is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: Northern Cali
Posts: 552
Default

Since I've been with one of my partners (of opposite gender) for 14 years, I don't get the "You're afraid of commitment" or "You're really in the closet" judgments. Being female (and blond and busty) does tend to get me the, "You're just saying you're bi for the attention" or "It's just a phase, you'll grow out of it" judgments but I just kind of shrug. If it's a phase, it's a 15+ year phase, and if it's just for attention, boy, am I doing it wrong!!

These kind of snap judgments, though, are exactly why TGIB and I are waiting til we've been together for a while before telling most of our family about us. Something already established with a few years of no drama will be much easier for a lot of people to get used to and give us a stronger position if we have to defend ourselves.
__________________
~~~~~~~~~
Pan Female, Hinge in a V between my mono (straight) husband, Monochrome and my poly (pan) partner, ThatGuyInBlack
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 04-26-2012, 01:05 AM
CielDuMatin's Avatar
CielDuMatin CielDuMatin is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Upstate New York, USA
Posts: 1,456
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by ThatGirlInGray View Post
Since I've been with one of my partners (of opposite gender) for 14 years, I don't get the "You're afraid of commitment" or "You're really in the closet" judgments.
Ah yes, that reminded me of another one... I, too, have been with my one partner for a long, long while - the thing that is thrown out about poly in that context "oh well, that must mean there's something wrong with your relationship".
__________________
Please check out The Birdcage - an open, friendly Polyamory forum for all parts of New York State
http://www.thebirdcage.org/

"Listen, or your tongue will make you deaf." - Native American Proverb
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 04-26-2012, 01:13 AM
ThatGirlInGray ThatGirlInGray is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: Northern Cali
Posts: 552
Default

Yes! Also, since my husband is mono with a "Who knows what the future will bring?" caveat thrown in there, I get, "He must be putting up with this so you won't leave him." *rolls eyes* I don't mind people putting their foot in their mouth in the surprise of being confronted with a new idea, but if I'm still getting these judgments 5 or 6 conversations down the road, buh-bye! *waves*
__________________
~~~~~~~~~
Pan Female, Hinge in a V between my mono (straight) husband, Monochrome and my poly (pan) partner, ThatGuyInBlack
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 04-26-2012, 03:30 PM
MeeraReed MeeraReed is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: East Coast, U.S.
Posts: 352
Default

Yup, I definitely encounter that mindset. It bothers me a lot.

But for me, there is also the added level of confusion that I like non-serious/ casual relationships (can I call them relationships?) and feel happiest in that type of arrangement.

My interest in poly came out of being involved with two people non-seriously (and later, three) and feeling I didn't want to get serious with either one and then have to give up the other. This arrangement lasted for years. (Then it blew up in my face).

I didn't know, at the time, about the possibility of being serious with more than one person--but also, I didn't feel a "serious" level of compatibility with either guy. One was my boyfriend-turned-ex-boyfriend-turned-FWB, and the other was a FWB. I liked them both immensely and cared for both deeply, but didn't want, say, to live with or marry either of them.

Anyway, I do feel incredibly frustrated when I encounter people who are dismissive of the possibility of non-monogamous relationships. It makes me sad.

But I also encounter a lot of people who do not feel that non-serious or casual dating has value, either. And that hurts me too, because I have grown and continue growing from that type of less-committed dating.
__________________
Single, straight, female, solo, non-monogamous.
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 04-27-2012, 02:45 PM
Fayerweather Fayerweather is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: New Jersey
Posts: 52
Default

I more often run into the "if you need love and sex outside of a relationship, then there's something wrong with that relationship". The idea that having more than one partner means that one or both partners is 1- flawed and unable to satisfy me, 2- that I'm insatiable, fickle, slutty or confused, or 3- that I don't really love my partners. That's not even skimming the surface of the monogamous minded projection and negative flack I've encountered since I came out as poly to my friends and family. I can't imagine what throwing bi-sexual into the mix must be like.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Tags
definitions, description, descriptions, monogamy

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 01:01 PM.