Polyamory.com Forum  

Go Back   Polyamory.com Forum > Polyamory > General Poly Discussions

Notices

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #21  
Old 12-01-2013, 08:58 AM
SchrodingersCat's Avatar
SchrodingersCat SchrodingersCat is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: Saskatchewan
Posts: 2,130
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by london View Post
And I've changed my mind, my ideal configuration would be like SCs.
It was fun explaining it to my mom at Yule last year. Throw in that someone in that chain is my former supervisor, that someone else is trans, and that two of their kids were fathered and are being co-parented by a gay drag queen who was also there that evening... I think we broke her brain a little bit.

Normal is boring.
__________________
Gralson: my husband (works out of town).
Auto: my girlfriend (lives with her husband Zoffee).

The most dangerous phrase in the English language is "we've always done it this way."
Reply With Quote
  #22  
Old 12-01-2013, 09:15 AM
Emm's Avatar
Emm Emm is offline
Moderator
 
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: Australia
Posts: 766
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by london View Post
For example, the mono/poly thread was someone monogamous wondering if her being monogamous means that she couldn't be in a poly relationship.
Which was exactly my point. You'll need to be clearer about your objection because I don't understand what you're trying to say.
Reply With Quote
  #23  
Old 12-01-2013, 09:43 AM
london london is offline
Banned
 
Join Date: May 2013
Location: UK - land of the free
Posts: 1,635
Default

Quote:
There often seems to be a tendency for people new to poly—and sometimes old-timers as well—to see a particular relationship shape as The One True Way To Be Poly™. Thisthen leads to communication problems when they assume that everyone else uses the same definitions that they do.
What I said is based on this part of the OP. I see how those threads are relevant to the next paragraph.
Reply With Quote
  #24  
Old 12-01-2013, 02:46 PM
pulliman pulliman is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: Eastern US...
Posts: 182
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by SchrodingersCat View Post
AFAIK, my girlfriend's husband's boyfriend's wife doesn't have another partner, but I don't keep tabs.
This is SUCH a great line. Thanks for making my morning.

Quote:
Some cultures have very rich vocabularies for familial relationships, e.g. the brother of your mother has a different title than the brother of your father or the husband of your mother's sister, etc. It would be interesting to live in a culture that had something similar for poly relationships.
Other cultures are ridiculously nebulous, and everyone outside of your spouse is an in-law. It makes for powerful word usage, because it's so flexible. In large families, you can just toss out the word and keep going, nobody blinks. They either know who the hell you're talking about or have no clue, and if they have no clue, well, it's an in-law, someone in the family.

I think metamour does a good job of that, just in an extended way. That whole tangle? Maybe they're all each other's metamours...
Reply With Quote
  #25  
Old 12-01-2013, 05:23 PM
JaneQSmythe JaneQSmythe is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: Pennsyl-tucky
Posts: 1,182
Default

I don't know how to make a pretty one, but here is our current config:



(The little grey dashed fans that come from VVs and TTs circle indicate that they may/do have other partners but I "don't keep tabs.")

Just for shits and giggles (and cause I'm a little OCD ) I made a "complicated" version that shows the various degrees of NON-sexual friendships in our group (blue lines) as well as gender and cohabitation configs (red boxes):



It amuses me to note that, while MrS looks to be rather isolated on the sexual/romantic version (as he only has ME), he is actually the most "embedded" in the friendship tangle.
__________________
Me: poly bi female, in an "open-but-not-looking" Vee-plus with -
MrS: hetero polyflexible male, live-in husband (21+ yrs)
Dude: hetero poly male, live-in boyfriend (3+ yrs) and MrS's best friend
Lotus: poly bi female, "it's complicated" relationships with Dude/JaneQ/MrS (1+ years)
TT: poly bi male, married to Lotus, FB with JaneQ
VV and MsJ: bi-women with male primaries, LTR LDR FWBs to JaneQ


My poly blogs here:
The Journey of JaneQSmythe
The Notebook of JaneQSmythe

Last edited by JaneQSmythe; 12-01-2013 at 05:48 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #26  
Old 12-01-2013, 06:27 PM
LovingRadiance's Avatar
LovingRadiance LovingRadiance is offline
Moderator
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Alaska
Posts: 5,401
Default

That's pretty cool Jane.

Mine (which I'm not going to try to draw) would end up that way too. GG would look isolated, except he's the one with the deepest ties in a friend/familial way to EVERYONE. lol Whereas Maca dates others and there's always someone in line (which I don't keep track of) but he's generally not really social and he doesn't "get in deep" with people very often at all.
__________________
"Love As Thou Wilt"
Reply With Quote
  #27  
Old 12-01-2013, 07:32 PM
pulliman pulliman is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: Eastern US...
Posts: 182
Default

Oh my god, Jane, that's awesome. Love it.
Reply With Quote
  #28  
Old 12-10-2013, 02:51 AM
nycindie's Avatar
nycindie nycindie is offline
Moderator
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: The Big Apple
Posts: 7,373
Default

My ideal configuration would be a daisy. Me in the center, with four or five "petals" extending out to my lovers.
__________________
The world opens up... when you do.

"Oh, oh, can't you see? Love is the drug for me." ~Bryan Ferry
"Love and the self are one . . ." ~Leo Buscaglia "
Reply With Quote
  #29  
Old 12-10-2013, 03:55 AM
Dagferi's Avatar
Dagferi Dagferi is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2012
Location: Pennsylvania
Posts: 1,082
Default

We look like a water molecule.
__________________
40 yo straight female
Married in the eyes of the government to Butch since 2001...
Murf my monogamous second husband has been with me since May of 2012.
In a V relationship with an average 60/40 split of time. Only due to Murf's and Butch's crappy work schedules.
Reply With Quote
  #30  
Old 12-10-2013, 07:19 PM
WhatToDo WhatToDo is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2013
Posts: 115
Default

Ideally my preferred structure would look like an N. A closed N although I wouldn't have an issue if the 2 ends of that N wanted to expand the grouping.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 06:11 AM.