Polyamory.com Forum  

Go Back   Polyamory.com Forum > Polyamory > Introductions

Notices

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #21  
Old 01-31-2011, 10:03 PM
River's Avatar
River River is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: NM, USA
Posts: 1,897
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by sohuman View Post
[I] have never laid eyes or ears, let alone any other body part, on an actual poly person.

[....]

His question: he has never met a single poly person in all his life either....
That's what folks used to say about gay people -- before gay people began coming out of the closet in vast numbers. My point being that you've both probably met and interacted with plenty of poly folks who just didn't happen to mention their poly status (for whatever reasons). A LOT of poly folks are in the closet about it. Which is a shame.
Reply With Quote
  #22  
Old 01-31-2011, 10:43 PM
TL4everu2's Avatar
TL4everu2 TL4everu2 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Clearwater, Fl.
Posts: 907
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by River View Post
That's what folks used to say about gay people -- before gay people began coming out of the closet in vast numbers. My point being that you've both probably met and interacted with plenty of poly folks who just didn't happen to mention their poly status (for whatever reasons). A LOT of poly folks are in the closet about it. Which is a shame.
To add to this, a LOT of poly folks, also think that they are "swingers". My wife and I did for the longest time. Then we found the word for it.
__________________
There is a lid for every pot...Sometimes even two or three...
Reply With Quote
  #23  
Old 02-01-2011, 03:09 AM
sohuman sohuman is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Posts: 25
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by TL4everu2 View Post
To add to this, a LOT of poly folks, also think that they are "swingers". My wife and I did for the longest time. Then we found the word for it.
I really feel the gay analogy, like there has always been something wrong with me that I couldn't be monogamous despite great love and commitment in all other aspects besides sexual exclusivity, and now I have come out as who I really am, and I'm not not okay for being this way.

As far as the term "swingers" I don't care for it or for what it is, mainly because of the movie Bruno (NOT a flattering light), the idea that it is supposed to be casual sex without emotional attachment, and the idea that only women can do homosexual acts in the swinger culture. Polyamory or polyfidelity feels more like home.

One last thought that I have been kicking around, and I think it is discussed in the book "The Monogamy Myth" and stemming from the idea that any relationships I form or do not form in the future are going to be on the up-and-up with my husband; I think that honesty will change those relationships. First, I will not participate in someone cheating on their SO in a purportedly mono relationship, so that will change things, and second, I think the relationships themselves will be different when conducted in the context of honesty. There needs to be a word, like the Hawthorne effect - I guess I propose that a relationship developed covertly suffers from Covert Relationship New Relationship Energy or CRNRE (involves all the intensity of NRE but with guilt, stress, shame, and secrecy) and a relationship developed in honesty with one's existing SO will not have those specific added elements. It will be interesting to see how and what develops.

Last edited by sohuman; 02-01-2011 at 03:11 AM.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 09:11 PM.