|
#21
|
|||
|
|||
|
you may have to iron out both your definitions of polyamory. to some its more casual and distant and not everyone knowing everyone else or not having to disclose everything. to others its about the couple adding more deep meaningful relationships to create a poly family.
|
|
#22
|
||||
|
||||
|
Wow, I have to go to work and so much to say... I hate that...
stupid work.Quote:
Other notes with no time to quote people; I think that often some people are not as confident or don't have the same depth of love as others for others. To think that we should blow off the feelings we have I think is dangerous in my opinion. I don't think sucking it up and just dealing is ever a way to create more depth and connection in our lives. That comes with struggle and working on things like boundaries. I find that some of the poly community is big on bowling over peoples jealousy and other hard emotions so that they can have freedom to be with whomever above all. While I admire this to one extent I wonder about the depth of relationship, the quality of relationship and whether or not the relationship is simply low grade. Where is the love in blowing off the emotions of those that we say we love? I have been thinking about that a lot lately and have been studying it (see my blog of the last week or so). I think that we should always make ourselves as vulnerable as we feel comfortable to others in order to achieve the most out of our life. If we don't and try and safe face all the time then we are left with low grad experiences and walk through life numb. The OP is struggling and hurt, why should she not see if she can ease that with her partners help. If he is not willing to look at this with her and is not willing to respect her feelings then I wonder if this partner is a good match for her.
__________________
|
|
#23
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
I've noticed that Rarechild and Catfish are a good example of the latter. There are far too many "good examples" of the former to mention. |
|
#24
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
I've been in situations where there were boundaries and its not a good feeling to be limited on how you can express your feelings to one of your "multi love" partners. Love without limits right? all in all if you can get your partner(s) to genuinely agree then any boundaries can be set and would be considered reasonable. Though I disagree I thought it be good to answer you question. ![]() Spread the love PT |
|
#25
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
By saying you don't understand the concept of boundaries, I am assumng that that doesn't mean your wife has an open slate to do whatever with her boyfriend. What if they spur of the moment want to engage another couple in sex? Would you not expect to be consulted in that? Wanting to be consulted can be seen as a boundary if that is the case. I understand not trying to limit what partners can do sexually within the confines of thier relationship, but do you extend that absence of boundaries to whoever they want to engage whenever?
__________________
Playing the Game of Life with Monopoly rules. Monogamy might just be in my genes ![]() Poly Events All Over |
|
#26
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
...Lol Lucky I run the IT department so I'm not limited to what I do with my computer. I agree that discussing it without the expectation of change to get down to the bottom of why a boundaries should be set with your partner(s) is an awesome idea. Vulnerability is a precious give to be given to deserving people and I'm all for it...I fee like vulnerability and a very close second to giving someone your love. ![]() Cheers PT |
|
#27
|
||||
|
||||
|
Having an open relationship of whatever dynamic is seen as a gift by alot of people. In enjoying that gift is it not too much to take into account the emotional impact of our actions on those we supposedly love? And if those people we supposedly love need reassurances through things that we see as having temporarily restricting confines on our ability to enjoy that freedom, are we so caught up in our right to do whatever that we discount thier emotions? Do we leave them to deal with "their shit" on their own. If this is the case than there is definitely very different concepts of what loving someone means.
If a person looks at another person and says "hey, that's your issue, deal with it" and follows that up with "I love you" than the person being spoken too should seek help building thier self confidence and find someone who actually does love them. Then again, if you are simply engaging in multiple relationships on surface levels, I get it. It's something without limits but I doubt it's love.
__________________
Playing the Game of Life with Monopoly rules. Monogamy might just be in my genes ![]() Poly Events All Over Last edited by MonoVCPHG; 11-30-2010 at 05:44 PM. |
|
#28
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
Love without limits ![]() PT |
|
#29
|
||||
|
||||
|
My main objection to the OP's boundaries is that she isn't comfortable with the poly situation in the first place and the proposed boundaries don't actually address the underlying problem.
This makes the boundaries arbitrary. I don't think that they will help until the underlying issues are resolved, one way or another. Rules are not a substitute for deep examination when it comes to dealing with insecurities. I believe there is such a thing as reasonable boundaries, but they must have coherent reasons behind them. |
|
#30
|
||||
|
||||
|
OP I get where you're coming from and having a hard time wrapping your head around your boyfriend finding love in different ways than you do. I personally don't think there's a problem setting a temporary boundary under the condition that you are going to work on why casual sex is a trigger for you.
Set a date to revisit the boundary and be open to adjusting it as you feel more comfortable in yourself. This goes back to moving at the speed of the slowest person. It really is ok to not be comfortable with things right off the bat, as long as you're willing to work on yourself and talk to each other so that you can both be happy and comfortable in the relationship.
__________________
Everything will be ok in the end. If it's not ok it's not the end.
|
![]() |
| Tags |
| boundaries, communication, compromise, rules |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|