|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
|
You know, when I think about friendship, I think about all the ties we have with various people that we regard as friends. Why do we have a need to have multiple friends? Because each friendship serves a different purpose for each one of us in different ways. It's also unrealistic to ask one person to be all the friend that you need. Some friendships are closer than others, but how often do you ever hear about friendships declaring their status for one another or having a legal binding agreement with each other establishing themselves as best friends?
Friendship and love can be two different things but they can also overlap. So, what makes the dynamic of friendships any different from love? Is it reasonable to expect that we should be able to to receive all the love that we can get from one person? What led society to believe that close and intimate love relationships should only be between two people of the opposite sex (other than procreation) or even between two people in general? I often wonder how things would be different if legal binding agreements to any marriage or unions were outlawed or didn't exist? |
|
#2
|
||||
|
||||
|
You might find some of these discussions thought-provoking and relevant to your questions:
Friends / Friendship.... poly friendships... Cuddling With Friends - & Non-sexual Intimacy Intimate vs. Friendship friendships - sad vent - posible link mono v poly styles Anam Cara - Soul Friends
__________________
. Independent solo polyamorist seeking lover-friends willing to invest in friendship, companionship, and love, but without a need for partnership. Never confuse commitment with exclusivity, love with ownership, nor sex with intimacy! For me, it is far better to grasp the Universe as it really is than to persist in delusion, however satisfying and reassuring. |
|
#3
|
|||
|
|||
|
Thank you very much for the links. I am new here. Lots of interesting stuff to read and catch up on. I am looking forward to learning and participating in these forums.
|
|
#4
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
That said, I suspect we'd be better off if folks remember that the marriage contract serves as shorthand for all sorts of other legal bindings and we could develop a variety of such contracts to provide for more customization of marriage agreements.
__________________
When speaking of various forms of non-monogamy...it ain't poly if you're just fucking around. While polyamory, open relationships, and swinging are all distinctly different approaches to non-monogamy, they are not mutually exlusive. Folks can, and some do, engage in more than one of them at a time--and it's all good. |
|
#5
|
|||
|
|||
|
Either they need to eliminate discriminatory references defining marriages as between a man and a woman (or two people in general), or start recognizing alternative forms of intimate relationships agreed upon by those who choose to be involved in the agreement. I tend to think it would be less of a mess if the government didn't have a hand in defining or recognizing intimate unions between mature adults.
Even without marriages many people still have to deal with various legalities of parental agreements, inheritances, finances, power of attorney and such. Why would there continue to be a need for the government's involvement in recognizing intimate unions between adults? |
|
#6
|
|||
|
|||
|
I see absolutely no difference between friendship and love. But, I have high standards for whom I would call a friend, as opposed to an acquaintance.
__________________
Independent, sex-positive, bi-curious, private, atheist, elitist, athletic dude. |
|
#7
|
||||
|
||||
|
I struggle with the concept myself, because I have high standards for my friends and usually end up falling for them. This is actually a problem I have right now, because I have a strange restrained semi-romantic relationship with my best friend, which led me to consider poly as an option...but my mono boyfriend says that I can "love" my best friends without it being "love", and then I get all confused...
|
|
#8
|
||||
|
||||
|
Friends and partners are very different to me. The closest friends I have were loves of mine and the partners I have are my closest friends. Its a matter of trust or no trust. I don't trust often. I love often though, but usually its from afar and with people I don't necessarily trust... If that makes sense at all?
__________________
|
|
#9
|
||||
|
||||
|
I love my friends. I tell them so. Some of them I kiss hello and goodbye, others are less expressive, and that's ok. Hell, I even have a lover who doesn't like PDA at ALL, so even though I'm more physically involved with him, I'm more physically expressive with other friends when we're out in a group.
There are so many levels of love and comfort with expressing that love. I have lately had a hard time distinguishing between friendship and love because I've found such a vast grey area. Instead of dissecting it, though, I'm trying to just enjoy the joyous ride that it is, while being open and honest with everyone involved.
__________________
http://lovetimesinfinity.wordpress.com/ |
|
#10
|
|||
|
|||
|
Whoa. That`s so cool...seems rare nowadays. Everything is a money shot in public squares.
__________________
Independent, sex-positive, bi-curious, private, atheist, elitist, athletic dude. Last edited by feelyunicorn; 03-09-2012 at 08:08 PM. |
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|