Polyamory.com Forum  

Go Back   Polyamory.com Forum > Polyamory > General Poly Discussions

Notices

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #21  
Old 02-18-2010, 12:30 AM
redpepper's Avatar
redpepper redpepper is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Canada
Posts: 7,633
Default

That is very cool ceoli! Do you have a link that you prefer?
__________________
Anyone want to be friends on Facebook?
Send me your name via PM
My blog
Reply With Quote
  #22  
Old 02-18-2010, 01:57 AM
MonoVCPHG's Avatar
MonoVCPHG MonoVCPHG is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: In Redpepper's heart
Posts: 4,742
Default

Awesome stuff Ceoli!

I must admit my original intent was not as deep as this topic has become.

Vandalin - My original thought was that people did have chemistry (sexually compatible) but that chemistry is affected by the total of one persons broader sexual interests and capabilities (what I simply see as sexuality).

I understand my view on this and was wondering the perspective of others.

I am again happy that the topic has evolved in depth

Carry on!
__________________

Playing the Game of Life with Monopoly rules.
Monogamy might just be in my genes

Poly Events All Over
Reply With Quote
  #23  
Old 02-18-2010, 07:51 AM
SchrodingersCat's Avatar
SchrodingersCat SchrodingersCat is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: Saskatchewan
Posts: 2,130
Default

I have to admit, I'm still rather confused by the analogy.

Is "the game" meaning "being in a romantic relationship" or "playing with a lot of people" or simply "something more than just catch" ?

I think it's definitely possible for two people to have a wonderful sexual relationship while understanding that they couldn't work as a couple. I also believe that people can be very emotionally and sexually connected, very happy with both, and yet not have all their sexual needs met by that one connection. And sometimes people have a great sexual relationship that develops into an emotional bond without the commitment of being "in a relationship" so they have "more than just catch" but not wanting to "play the game"

I'm not sure if any of this is what you mean by "not compatible sexuality" ?

It it almost seems like my interpretation is "sexually compatible" vs "emotionally compatibility" ... having sex is part of one's sexuality. If your sex is compatible, it seems to follow that your sexuality is also?
__________________
Gralson: my husband (works out of town).
Auto: my girlfriend (lives with her husband Zoffee).

The most dangerous phrase in the English language is "we've always done it this way."
Reply With Quote
  #24  
Old 07-12-2010, 06:13 AM
marksbabygirl marksbabygirl is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Squamish, BC
Posts: 790
Default

Yep yep yep..

I can find someone incredibly sexxy and sexually compatible, but they are interested in things that *I* find squicky

Those things may be hard limits for me but necessary for their sexual expression.

Using one of my kinks as an example - I like humiliation play - but don't use me as a toilet.... that's a deal breaker for me.

So yes - I think that I can be sexually compatible but our sexuality be incompatible.

Jane
__________________
Some believe in destiny, and some believe in fate
I believe that happiness is something we create


My Journey to Health and Fitness
My Journey as a Widow

Jane
Reply With Quote
Reply

Tags
compatibility, sexual, sexuality

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 01:32 PM.