|
#411
05-05-2011, 02:04 PM
|
||||
|
||||
Quote:
 
__________________
Everything will be ok in the end. If it's not ok it's not the end.
|
|
#412
05-05-2011, 10:54 PM
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
__________________
|
|
#413
05-06-2011, 04:31 PM
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
__________________
 Playing the Game of Life with Monopoly rules. Monogamy might just be in my genes Poly Events All Over
|
|
#414
05-06-2011, 05:55 PM
|
||||
|
||||
|
That's OK, you've got a back, belly and legs, don't you?
When my kids were little, I switched over to jelly and spaghetti sauce jars for drinking glasses. They don't break easy. Helpful hint.
__________________
Love withers under constraint; its very essence is liberty. It is compatible neither with envy, jealousy or fear. It is there most pure, perfect and unlimited when its votaries live in confidence, equality and unreserve. ~Percy Byshe Shelley
|
|
#415
05-06-2011, 06:22 PM
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
__________________
Playing the Game of Life with Monopoly rules. Monogamy might just be in my genes Poly Events All Over
|
|
#416
05-22-2011, 09:27 PM
|
||||
|
||||
|
WOW... I can't believe this thread has been around over a year and I missed it! I just spent two hours reading through all 42 pages!
Lots of things stuck out to me (loved post #170) so I will address a few. Someone (I think it was RedPepper) mentioned the expense of toys. If you can think creatively, making low cost toys out of every day items you may already have will save a lot. For instance, I recently saw a flogger made entirely of duct tape. Someone else mentioned the fear/apprehension of "losing themselves" in submission. Honestly, that was a big concern for me as well. It was a discussion my Dom and I visited and revisited over and over. A big help in ensuring this does not happen is adapting the contract details to the personality of the sub, so he/she can still be themselves and still please their dominant. Cookie cutter contracts just set a sub up for failure, and any good dominant wants their sub to succeed. Another point I want to add my two cents to: someone mentioned that once a person submits, they no longer have any rights. I couldn't disagree more. Submission is a GIFT. A slave/sub has the right to revoke that gift at any time. We have the right to have our thoughts heard and addressed.
__________________
Alli Sex between a man and a woman can be absolutely wonderful - provided you get between the right man and the right woman. ~Woody Allen
|
|
#417
05-22-2011, 11:36 PM
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
If I had a submissive who couldn't retract their submission, then I would feel like a worthless Domme. What kind of worthless, ugly wretch has to FORCE the love and submission of another? If I cannot woo and win the submission, then I don't deserve it. So I love your point here!
__________________
 With all my heart I will love and not fail,
With all my soul I will fly and not fall.
|
|
#418
07-18-2011, 03:50 PM
|
||||
|
||||
|
Okay, Mono posted this on RP's thread and it got me wondering...
Quote:
__________________
. Independent solo polyamorist seeking lover-friends willing to invest in friendship, companionship, and love, but without a need for partnership. Never confuse commitment with exclusivity, love with ownership, nor sex with intimacy! For me, it is far better to grasp the Universe as it really is than to persist in delusion, however satisfying and reassuring.
|
|
#419
07-18-2011, 03:52 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
There is also, for some, the size difference. Might be kind of empowering to have a big strong man licking your boots if you are small 5'4.. for example
|
|
#420
07-18-2011, 03:54 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Some people are sexually turned-on by feet or footwear. Ever heard of something called a "fetish"? That's when sexual arousal is derived from something that is not typically perceived as such.
More likely, it's the SUB who gets turned on by licking someone else's shoes.
|
 |
| Tags |
| bdsm, dominant, fetishes, sex play, submissive |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Linear Mode
