Polyamory.com Forum  

Go Back   Polyamory.com Forum > Polyamory > General Poly Discussions

Notices

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #51  
Old 04-23-2010, 01:47 PM
Quath Quath is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 504
Default

Culturally, it is acceptable for men to have many straight sexual encounters and it is ok for women to be a little bisexual. (Think of the sterotypical porn movie.) So a MFF threesome is considered mostly acceptable by society and so I think that is why bisexual women are in high demand.

However, I think we should try to think past that and figure out what is right for us in our moment. Maybe it is a V or W? Maybe a MMF triad? Maybe swinging?
Reply With Quote
  #52  
Old 04-23-2010, 02:07 PM
biglover biglover is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Posts: 17
Default

Sorry, i'm a bit of a noob...

What is a unicorn in poly teerms?
Reply With Quote
  #53  
Old 04-23-2010, 02:11 PM
Ariakas Ariakas is offline
Moderator
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Posts: 2,872
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by biglover View Post
Sorry, i'm a bit of a noob...

What is a unicorn in poly teerms?
Another term is the hot bi-babe that is willing to have a loving triad
Reply With Quote
  #54  
Old 04-23-2010, 02:15 PM
biglover biglover is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Posts: 17
Default

I see... That is pretty sweet. so then what is the female equivalent of the unicorn? Pegaseus?

sorry, what a meant was the equivalent as in a bi male that is the third in a triad. would that be considered a pesaseus or centaur? since the female version is a unicorn.

Last edited by NeonKaos; 04-23-2010 at 03:54 PM. Reason: merge posts
Reply With Quote
  #55  
Old 04-23-2010, 03:53 PM
NeonKaos NeonKaos is offline
Custodian
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: new england
Posts: 3,221
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by biglover View Post
sorry, what a meant was the equivalent as in a bi male that is the third in a triad. would that be considered a pesaseus or centaur? since the female version is a unicorn.

For the answer, please read the earlier posts in this thread as it has been merged with an older thread in which this topic was discussed. Thank you.
Reply With Quote
  #56  
Old 04-23-2010, 06:07 PM
biglover biglover is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Posts: 17
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by River View Post
I agree. That is, I think we all exist somewhere on a bisexual spectrum. Many people have very, very little same-sex attraction. Others have a great deal. But we're all on the spectrum, somewhere. Most are closer to the middle of the spectrum than most of us imagine. But, of course, not all are conscious of that which is repressed!
I believe this is known as the Kinsey scale. It has helped me a lot to figure out how i fit in on the spectrum

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kinsey_scale
Reply With Quote
  #57  
Old 04-23-2010, 06:46 PM
redpepper's Avatar
redpepper redpepper is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Canada
Posts: 7,637
Default

cool that you found that again- there is another thread on this scale of Kinsey's, just so you know... I also think there is a relationship scale, that has also been talked about on another thread.... one that goes from swinger-no love style to poly-fidelity style. I think that, it changes from relationship to relationship and much like the scale of sexuality is fluid throughout life.
__________________
Anyone want to be friends on Facebook?
Send me your name via PM
My blog
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 01:43 AM.