|
#221
|
||||
|
||||
|
Do you think it's better for people to presumptuously call another a supremacist under the guise of "if so"? NYC didn't even wait to get an answer back about whether or not I meant "being the 'cultured westerner' who would save them from themselves". She/He just launched into his/her presumption calling me all kinds of bigoted words. I don't need to "lord over" that, or be "genetically predetermined" to say that NYC was disrespectful. And I do so, so she/he can have either better restraint in the future, or more respectful communication.
|
|
#222
|
|||
|
|||
|
The guy is trolling. He is amusing himself by playing a vulgar stereotype up so he can watch as everyone scrambles to defend views that support elitism and genetic superiority when he feigns persecution.
In other words: how funny would it be to take a bunch of anything goes sexual idealists and manipulate them into defending one of the worst shades of non monogamy known to history? |
|
#223
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
|
|
#224
|
||||
|
||||
|
I don't think it's all that uncommon for relationships, marriages, to be in that structure. Where if the provider is feeling unappreciated they eventually must change things out of that discord. And there are millions of relationships across the nation of the United States alone, where one person brings home the bacon and the other takes care of house and family while they're gone. This is not outlandish. The way you describe it using flippant opinionated summarization maybe, but not if you use my words.
|
|
#225
|
||||
|
||||
|
There has been no deliberate cherry picking going on here. I even take the time to respond to the most useless of your responses. Your "cherry picking" defense is just a result of insecurities about your words not getting any attention. But that is not deliberate on my, or any others parts (as far as I can tell). It's a big thread. We're trying to spend time talking about as much as we can. I am not afraid to talk about anything. If you feel something you said or another said has been neglected, bump it up in a quote, and we'll address it. We've taken ample time to do discuss as much as we can. I can vouch for myself in saying that I try my best to answer everybody in this thread, if it even has an ounce of relevance or related relevance.
|
|
#226
|
||||
|
||||
|
Oh FFS, don't be lazy and do your own research to work out whether this is legit or not. I did.
__________________
Please check out The Birdcage - an open, friendly Polyamory forum for all parts of New York State
http://www.thebirdcage.org/ "Listen, or your tongue will make you deaf." - Native American Proverb |
|
#227
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
|
|
#228
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
(however that was funny! lol)
|
|
#229
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
But I will add this: it seems to me that Evan is a essentially a polygamist, not a polyamorist. Nothing wrong with that, but it is different. |
|
#230
|
|||
|
|||
|
Oh call it a show of good faith for others. I've already come to my own conclusions. I don't care enough about out polying anyone to be civil in the face of sexual slavery. I'll leave that to you.
|
![]() |
| Tags |
| chauvinist, cross cultural, harem, narcissist, open, opening up, sexist |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|