Polyamory.com Forum  

Go Back   Polyamory.com Forum > Polyamory > General Poly Discussions

Notices

View Poll Results: Going by orientation and/or circumstances: How would you classify you at this moment?
Very (about 90-100%) polyamorous. 3 27.27%
Moderately (about 66-75%) polyamorous. 6 54.55%
Very (about 90-100%) monogamous. 0 0%
Moderately (about 66-75%) monogamous. 1 9.09%
Half monogamous, half polyamorous (about 50%/50%). 0 0%
Both monogamous and polyamorous (about 100%/100%). 0 0%
Neither monogamous nor polyamorous (about 0%/0%). 1 9.09%
I wouldn't classify myself as any of the above. 0 0%
Voters: 11. You may not vote on this poll

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 05-24-2012, 07:26 AM
kdt26417's Avatar
kdt26417 kdt26417 is online now
Official Greeter
 
Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: Olympia, Washington
Posts: 5,868
Default Philosophical Semantics, Part III

Going by internal orientation, external circumstances, or both: How would you classify yourself at this moment?
  • Very (about 90-100%) polyamorous.
  • Moderately (about 66-75%) polyamorous.
  • Very (about 90-100%) monogamous.
  • Moderately (about 66-75%) monogamous.
  • Half monogamous, half polyamorous (about 50%/50%).
  • Both monogamous and polyamorous (about 100%/100%).
  • Neither monogamous nor polyamorous (about 0%/0%).
  • I wouldn't classify myself as any of the above.
Any detail you could go into for your answer would be appreciated (i.e., why did you pick that answer).

Prequel threads:
Philosophical Semantics, Part I
Philosophical Semantics, Part II

Sequel thread:
Philosophical Semantics, Part IV
__________________
Love means never having to say, "Put down that meat cleaver!"

Last edited by kdt26417; 05-24-2012 at 07:35 AM.
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 05-24-2012, 07:57 AM
kdt26417's Avatar
kdt26417 kdt26417 is online now
Official Greeter
 
Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: Olympia, Washington
Posts: 5,868
Default

I voted very (about 90-100%) polyamorous. It was a tough call; I considered moderately (about 66-75% polyamorous). I think I'm about 85% polyamorous, perhaps 90%. Under good conditions, I'm probably able to live an a monogamous setting and be happy enough. But I really like polyamorous principles, and strongly desire to be a part of them in day-to-day life. My situation is "very polyamorous" because we have an all-primary structure; lots of emotional involvement and tons of commitment (between the three of us).

"Amount of polyamory/monogamy" is very difficult to quantify. These survey questions attempt to cut through the math and make intuitive judgments. Further discussion on this topic is welcome, for those who are interested.
__________________
Love means never having to say, "Put down that meat cleaver!"
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 05-24-2012, 08:08 AM
nycindie's Avatar
nycindie nycindie is offline
Moderator
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: The Big Apple
Posts: 7,414
Default

I thought about voting "I wouldn't classify myself as any of the above," but then I saw "neither monogamous nor polyamorous" and voted that way because the poll is asking how I would classify myself, and I do not buy into the whole polyamorous/monogamous orientation idea. To me, the terms only describe structures for relationships. I am just a person and I may call myself a polyamorist, as a way to represent what I practice or strive for in my life, but not polyamorous as a personal orientation.
__________________
The world opens up... when you do.

"Oh, oh, can't you see? Love is the drug for me." ~Bryan Ferry
"Love and the self are one . . ." ~Leo Buscaglia "

An excellent blog post against hierarchy in polyamory: http://solopoly.net/2014/10/31/why-i...short-version/
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 05-24-2012, 01:46 PM
JaneQSmythe JaneQSmythe is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: Pennsyl-tucky
Posts: 1,202
Default

I waffled on this one. In general I view mono vs. poly as describing relationships not people. On the other hand if one is open to more than one romantic relationship at a time, even if they are in NO relationships currently, then I would still think of them as "poly". (Kind of like I think someone can be gay/straight/bi even if they are currently celibate).

I picked moderately poly for me - I'm happy in my current poly relationship but for long stretches of my life I was just with MrS and was perfectly happy with that as well (open to but not actively seeking other relationships).

JaneQ
__________________
Me: poly bi female, in an "open-but-not-looking" Vee-plus with -
MrS: hetero polyflexible male, live-in husband (22+ yrs)
Dude: hetero poly male, live-in boyfriend (3+ yrs) and MrS's best friend
Lotus: poly bi female, "it's complicated" relationships with Dude/JaneQ/MrS (1+ years)
TT: poly male, married to Lotus, FB with JaneQ
VV and MsJ: bi-women with male primaries, LTR LDR FWBs to JaneQ


My poly blogs here:
The Journey of JaneQSmythe
The Notebook of JaneQSmythe
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 05-24-2012, 02:51 PM
kdt26417's Avatar
kdt26417 kdt26417 is online now
Official Greeter
 
Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: Olympia, Washington
Posts: 5,868
Default

@ all so far: Thx for your votes and explanations. There's all kinds of valid approaches to the question: internal orientation, present circumstances, neither, both. I tried to set up the question (and available answers) to be as accomodating as possible.

Polyamory/polyamorist do seem to be more situation-based words than polyamorous (which generally seems like a more orientation-based word).
__________________
Love means never having to say, "Put down that meat cleaver!"
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 05-25-2012, 04:27 AM
ThatGirlInGray ThatGirlInGray is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: Northern Cali
Posts: 552
Default

I had a hard time choosing too, because I'm not sure what "polyamorous" is supposed to encompass in this case. I'm definitely non-monogamous/open, but I've never sought out multiple romantic relationships. At the moment I'm poly because I developed a deeper relationship with my FWB, but if something were to happen to one of my partners (heaven forbid!) I don't think I'd go looking for someone else to have this type of relationship structure with. It's what works for us so I can have both of them as a part of my life, but I think it ONLY works for us because it's these two people. Remove either one of them and I'm no longer poly (yes, the rewards are worth it but GOD is poly a lot of work!).

So I chose 66-75% poly.
__________________
~~~~~~~~~
Pan Female, Hinge in a V between my mono (straight) husband, Monochrome and my poly (pan) partner, ThatGuyInBlack
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 05-25-2012, 04:42 AM
NovemberRain's Avatar
NovemberRain NovemberRain is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2011
Posts: 699
Default

I chose moderately poly because I have two men; but I don't have to share them with anyone else.
__________________
Love is that condition in which the happiness of another person is essential to your own...
Robert A. Heinlein

Me: female, bi, (formerly hinge of a vee)
with FirstBoyFriend (FBF)(moderately long-distance)
and no longer with CurrentBoyFriend (CBF)(who lives in the apartment building next door)
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 05-25-2012, 07:19 PM
kdt26417's Avatar
kdt26417 kdt26417 is online now
Official Greeter
 
Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: Olympia, Washington
Posts: 5,868
Default

Both those votes sound reasonable to me.
__________________
Love means never having to say, "Put down that meat cleaver!"
Reply With Quote
Reply

Tags
measurement, mono/poly, poly, polyamory

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 10:35 PM.