Polyamory.com Forum  

Go Back   Polyamory.com Forum > Polyamory > General Poly Discussions

Notices

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 01-26-2012, 09:26 PM
redpepper's Avatar
redpepper redpepper is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Canada
Posts: 7,632
Default bi-monogamy, what is it?

My friend wrote this the other day and I wondered your thoughts on it.

"This was the question I asked a girl who lists herself bi and has criteria for both a male and a female partner. Her profile doesn't give any other hints to her, um, "quantitative orientation", so the question popped out.

Afterwards, I found the term "bi-monogamous" kind of curious. I wasn't sure if it was something I'd seen before or if it was one of those neologisms my mind makes up and just tries to pass off as normal everyday parlance. I googled it, and found a lot of discussion on the dissonance of being bisexual AND monogamous, but no references to the term "bi-monogamous". Has anyone seen this before? Is there another term for this already? Finally, what would your answer to the original question be?"

Is this a form of Poly-fi?
Is this related to the term "closed loop relationship?"
__________________
Anyone want to be friends on Facebook?
Send me your name via PM
My blog
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 01-27-2012, 04:01 AM
Vixtoria's Avatar
Vixtoria Vixtoria is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Posts: 297
Default

I believe it's the same thing as poly-fi, but prescriptive poly. One female and one male relationship. It's like, baby steps into Poly without actually saying you are poly.

I had a friend who was gay but found it easier to say he was bi. Kind of the same thing. You aren't poly, you aren't interested in open relationships, you just like boys and girls, so you want A girl to date and A boy to date. Keeping both relationships separate.
__________________
Me: Late 30s pansexual poly.
DH: My husband of 19 yrs and father of 3 teen girls.
DC: LDR of +4 year
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 01-27-2012, 04:07 AM
opalescent opalescent is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: US
Posts: 1,176
Default

Huh. No idea really.

But if I was making up a definition, I would say it is the agreement of a bi person in a poly relationship to only date people who are the opposite sex of their primary partner. So a woman who agrees to only see women because of her male partner's discomfort is practicing bi monogamy.

At least that's what it's going to be in my head from now on!
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 01-27-2012, 04:29 AM
SourGirl's Avatar
SourGirl SourGirl is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: South of an Igloo, North of a Desert.
Posts: 885
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Vixtoria View Post
I believe it's the same thing as poly-fi, but prescriptive poly. One female and one male relationship. It's like, baby steps into Poly without actually saying you are poly.

I had a friend who was gay but found it easier to say he was bi. Kind of the same thing. You aren't poly, you aren't interested in open relationships, you just like boys and girls, so you want A girl to date and A boy to date. Keeping both relationships separate.
Well that is an interesting .....dismissal ?

So if I said,..... I have been non-mongamous for 10+ years, done the swing thing, done the poly thing, neither one with any OPP rules, or 'soft'....and I am now at a place where I realize I only want my husband for male company, and my girlfriend for female company......How do you put that into,..'baby steps into poly ' ?

Anywho,....Guess I have to answer the questions now.

Yes, heard this before, albeit fairly recently. This is a term I heard about 3 months ago. It resonated with me, and made sense.

As for dating a man and a woman, and how to define it :

I put it in the poly-fi category, if those involved, find their relationship evolves around the 'spirit' of poly interactions, common poly-beliefs, and common poly practices. The need to share lives, shared communication, shared goals.

I would put it in the bi-monogamous category, if the relationships are truly separate, and seem to follow the basic rules of monogamy. For instance, if the description of love felt for the woman, is a different love then what is felt for the man. If the relationships have their own paths, and don`t interact.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 01-27-2012, 07:13 AM
redpepper's Avatar
redpepper redpepper is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Canada
Posts: 7,632
Default

To me being bisexual and being poly are about two different identities. One being a sexual orientation and the other being a relationship orientation. People could be bi and poly or bi and mono. Just as readily as if they were straight and poly or straight and mono. Just because someone is bi, doesn't automatically mean they are poly. I know committed bisexual people who are married monogamously and that is how it works for them. They didn't stop being bi because they got married.
__________________
Anyone want to be friends on Facebook?
Send me your name via PM
My blog
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 01-27-2012, 08:27 AM
SourGirl's Avatar
SourGirl SourGirl is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: South of an Igloo, North of a Desert.
Posts: 885
Default

Well yes, but isn`t this in the context of being 'active' ?

If you are bi, and 'made your choice' and decide to be monogamous to one person /sex, you wouldn`t be needing the add-on of the 'bi' to the monogamous part.

I see the context relative to the environment. I assumed in the question, being on a poly group, you were talking about someone actively looking for a partner to fulfill each side of their sexuality ?
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 01-27-2012, 05:25 PM
Vixtoria's Avatar
Vixtoria Vixtoria is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Posts: 297
Default

When I first started having multiple relationships since the only model I knew was monogamy I went with that. I told myself, and tried to live as though I was having two separate monogamous relationships. Personally, I realized that didn't work. It didn't matter that my husband and boyfriend/girlfriend did not meet, talk or interact in any way. The relationships still affected each person. If only because of how I felt. If I had a really good talk or time with one, then that energy and emotion was felt by the other. If I had a fight, argument or bad time with one, the other knew. It was literally impossible to have two separate relationships. To say that I had two monogamous relationships was inaccurate. Even though hubby is mono he says he is in a poly relationship, because he is. Every relationship carries over to the other in SOME way.

When I said baby steps into poly, that's how I meant it, because multiple loving relationships that are honest, open and ethical IS poly, even if you don't use the label. (Not everyone is a fan of labels). Not everyone was lucky enough to understand that they were poly or be in poly relationships from the get go. Some move into poly in steps. Some through cheating, then non monogamy, then ethical non monogamy, then poly.

I wasn't maligning how anyone 'does' poly. Some are prescriptive, "I like having X number of partners, so many men so many women." and that's fine for them. Some are more descriptive in that they take each relationship as it comes and not concerned with how many, how serious, or what type of relationship it is. Whatever works for you and your partners!
__________________
Me: Late 30s pansexual poly.
DH: My husband of 19 yrs and father of 3 teen girls.
DC: LDR of +4 year

Last edited by Vixtoria; 01-27-2012 at 05:27 PM. Reason: tried to make it clearer
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 01-27-2012, 08:26 PM
AutumnalTone AutumnalTone is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Kansas City Metro
Posts: 2,186
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by redpepper View Post
...but no references to the term "bi-monogamous". Has anyone seen this before? Is there another term for this already? Finally, what would your answer to the original question be?"

Is this a form of Poly-fi?
Is this related to the term "closed loop relationship?"
I'd say it's one of those stupid things people make up when they're trying to describe something that doesn't have an established term. Being involved with two people is polyamorous--no monogamy involved. They may be involved with only one female-aspected person and only one male-aspected person and it doesn't change the fact that they are involved with two actual people, and thus, polyamorous.

They should just describe as polyfi and be done with it. It really doesn't matter, for description purposes, whether they're involved with two males or two females or one of each--they're involved with two folks and not looking for more.
__________________
When speaking of various forms of non-monogamy...it ain't poly if you're just fucking around.

While polyamory, open relationships, and swinging are all distinctly different approaches to non-monogamy, they are not mutually exlusive. Folks can, and some do, engage in more than one of them at a time--and it's all good.
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 01-27-2012, 08:35 PM
SourGirl's Avatar
SourGirl SourGirl is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: South of an Igloo, North of a Desert.
Posts: 885
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Vixtoria View Post

I wasn't maligning how anyone 'does' poly. Some are prescriptive, "I like having X number of partners, so many men so many women." and that's fine for them. Some are more descriptive in that they take each relationship as it comes and not concerned with how many, how serious, or what type of relationship it is. Whatever works for you and your partners!
Actually, I regret my comment. I was up late last night with kiddies, and really shouldn`t of posted on one of these baited label-threads. They always end the same. ( Not your fault.) Usually I know better. So I apologize for questioning you.
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 01-27-2012, 09:24 PM
ThatGirlInGray ThatGirlInGray is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: Northern Cali
Posts: 552
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by AutumnalTone View Post
I'd say it's one of those stupid things people make up when they're trying to describe something that doesn't have an established term. Being involved with two people is polyamorous--no monogamy involved. They may be involved with only one female-aspected person and only one male-aspected person and it doesn't change the fact that they are involved with two actual people, and thus, polyamorous.

They should just describe as polyfi and be done with it. It really doesn't matter, for description purposes, whether they're involved with two males or two females or one of each--they're involved with two folks and not looking for more.
I'm going to play Devil's Advocate here. First of all, making up something because there isn't an established term is one way we get new words, like Polyamorous. Being made-up doesn't necessarily make it stupid.

Second, while I wouldn't bother using the term (because I'm much more likely to just explain rather than labeling), I could see it applying to my life if other paths had been taken. In my situation, MC is mono. I am his only partner. I am poly, but I have two partners and that's it. I'm not looking for more, I'm not playing with anyone, I'm "polysaturated". TGIB is poly, and while I'm his only partner at the moment, he will likely have multiple partners over the next several years. We are NOT polyfi or closed loop. So IF, instead of being with TGIB, my other partner were a woman, I could see a term like bi-monogamy being used to explain that I'm with one man and one woman and that's it. Polyfi wouldn't apply if Hypothetical Female Partner were still having relationships with other people.
__________________
~~~~~~~~~
Pan Female, Hinge in a V between my mono (straight) husband, Monochrome and my poly (pan) partner, ThatGuyInBlack
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 02:16 AM.