Polyamory.com Forum  

Go Back   Polyamory.com Forum > Polyamory > General Poly Discussions

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 02-17-2012, 11:34 PM
redpepper's Avatar
redpepper redpepper is offline
Moderator
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Canada
Posts: 7,519
Default "central" = "primary"

Great article that suggests "central" partner over "primary." Thoughts?

http://m.facebook.com/l.php?u=https%...2F&h=wAQF0QCyF

I remember hearing the term "anchor partner" at one point too. Thoughts on that?
__________________
Anyone want to be friends on Facebook?
Send me your name via PM
My blog
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 02-17-2012, 11:47 PM
nycindie's Avatar
nycindie nycindie is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: The Big Apple
Posts: 5,823
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by redpepper View Post
Great article that suggests "central" partner over "primary." Thoughts?

http://m.facebook.com/l.php?u=https%...2F&h=wAQF0QCyF

I remember hearing the term "anchor partner" at one point too. Thoughts on that?
So, if one partner is central, that makes all the rest on the side or periphery. Not sure if that's better.
__________________
.
Independent solo polyamorist seeking lover-friends willing to invest in friendship, companionship, and love, but without a need for partnership.

Never confuse commitment with exclusivity, love with ownership, nor sex with intimacy!
For me, it is far better to grasp the Universe as it really is than to persist in delusion, however satisfying and reassuring.
~ Carl Sagan
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 02-18-2012, 12:15 AM
redpepper's Avatar
redpepper redpepper is offline
Moderator
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Canada
Posts: 7,519
Default

Thoughts on this included that it reduces the risk of hierarchical thinking and could reduce the emotional impact of that hierarchical thinking.
__________________
Anyone want to be friends on Facebook?
Send me your name via PM
My blog
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 02-18-2012, 12:29 AM
nycindie's Avatar
nycindie nycindie is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: The Big Apple
Posts: 5,823
Default

Hmmm... when one person is given a designation that makes them special in some way, how is that not a hierarchy?

Central and primary would seem to be pretty much the same thing to me. Anchor a little less so, though it gives the impression of being tied to whomever is the anchor person in a way that one is not tied to other people.

I'm not sure if many people are able to wrap their brains around the idea of "separate but equal" in poly relationships, especially when they are married and feel like their spouse should be considered before all others. It seems like very few people really take an egalitarian approach to poly, no matter how much they might say they don't like hierarchies. My guess is that comes with experience.
__________________
.
Independent solo polyamorist seeking lover-friends willing to invest in friendship, companionship, and love, but without a need for partnership.

Never confuse commitment with exclusivity, love with ownership, nor sex with intimacy!
For me, it is far better to grasp the Universe as it really is than to persist in delusion, however satisfying and reassuring.
~ Carl Sagan
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 02-18-2012, 01:49 AM
SourGirl's Avatar
SourGirl SourGirl is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: South of an Igloo, North of a Desert.
Posts: 890
Default

I have no problem with hierarchy, or saying hubby is #1. Anything else is a fringe benefit,....so,..even I think it looks like a fluffy term to cover up shit with poop.
A few will use it correctly, and the rest will use it as a catch-phrase to sound more appealing and get what they want in the short-term.

However if you like it, and feel inclined to it,..use it !
I just wouldn`t use it expecting it to change how people interact.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 02-18-2012, 05:06 AM
drtalon's Avatar
drtalon drtalon is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: Raleigh, NC
Posts: 103
Default

Primary is to central as secondary is to _____________?

I've always been opposed to the idea of hierarchy, but when you're living with partner(s) and have responsibilities around money and basic survival, it's necessarily more involved than a partner you don't share those things with. I'd really like to see labels built around those differences instead...

"Hi, new friend! This is my partner, Jack, and my partner, Jill, who is also my _______________ because we own a house together." (or raise kids together, etc.)

Primary
Central
Homebuilder
Home plate (methinks poly baseball analogies are fertile ground)
Checkmate
Money-Honey
Reply With Quote
Reply

Tags
definitions, defintions, equanimity, primaries, primary, primary/secondary, secondaries, terminology

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 10:42 PM.