|
|
|
#1
|
||||
|
||||
|
We all make a big point of avoiding the "polygamous" label, but we throw around "monogamous" like it's the opposite of polyamorous. But literally, monogamous means one spouse. So technically, I'm polyamorous, monoandrous, and polysexual.
This has actually been on my mind lately... brought up by my other topic, because my husband is monoamorous but polysexual. I'm polyamorous, but only polysexual as a consequence of that; i.e. I don't engage in casual sex. He also feels that one marriage is more than enough trouble for his life, so he's also monogynous by choice, despite the fact that it's also enforced by law... I just got thinking about this more today, reading a paper on polyamory* ... Anyway, the author made a point of mentioning that while monoamorous is the antithesis of polyamorous, he used the phrase monogamous for his survey because it was better understood by the population. LoL also, my spellchecker is going nuts from all those "made-up" words... *Morrison, T.G., Beaulieu, D., Brockman, M., & O'Beaglaoich, C. A comparison of polyamorous and monoamorous persons: Are there differences in indices of relationship well-being and sociosexuality? Psychology & Sexuality. Edited: mixed up monogamy and monogyny. Monogamy is one spouse of either gender, monogyny is one wife.
__________________
I am who I am. I don't need labels to define me. They're sticky, and I hate the glue they leave behind.
Last edited by SchrodingersCat; 11-24-2011 at 05:54 PM. |
|
#2
|
||||
|
||||
|
I actually was thinking about this the other day. I was wondering how the word monogamy, with it's -gamy ending, is applied to all dyadic relationships whether married or not, yet polygamy only refers to plural marriages. Maybe it's because Western culture just expected anyone who pairs up to eventually marry. Dating and not marrying is a fairly modern development. I meant to look up the etymology of -gamy and how it relates to marriage, but then forgot.
So, here's what I just found now at etymonline.com: -gamous
__________________
. Independent solo polyamorist seeking lover-friends willing to invest in friendship, companionship, and love, but without a need for partnership. Never confuse commitment with exclusivity, love with ownership, nor sex with intimacy! For me, it is far better to grasp the Universe as it really is than to persist in delusion, however satisfying and reassuring. Last edited by nycindie; 11-24-2011 at 10:27 AM. |
|
#3
|
||||
|
||||
|
I don't, I generally use mono meaning the short of monoamorous, but by using just mono, even people who would read it as monoagmous understand it.
I'm against marriage altogether, so what would be the prefix to that "gamous"?
__________________
[Insert witty comment here]
Feel free to add me up on facebook. - Just click here. Do send a message in your request saying who you are and that you're from this forum. It will help me filter out any spam requests. =] |
|
#4
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
Regarding the whole thread, this is part of the reason I resist labels to begin with, perhaps especially 'polyamorous'. Labels are either too precise, or not precise enough, or perhaps precise in the wrong direction. Labels come with pre-packaged judgments and expectations attached, which I generally reject. That said, I do think it appropriate to talk about compulsory monogamy, because that is the dominant model in Western culture: one woman and one man get married, raise children together, and remain steadfastly faithful to one another. I am married, but no longer monogamous. In rejecting monogamy, I do not repudiate my commitment to my wife and our children - having children together does make a difference, and is probably the best possible reason for the civil side of marriage. I repudiate the cultural expectation that monogamy is the only appropriate way for people to have intimate relationships with one another. Would that make me metagamous? And while we're talking about language, there is often some fuss over the mixed origins of 'polyamory', which combines a Greek and a Latin root. Well, so does 'heterosexual' and, for that matter, 'automobile'. As for 'homosexual', it depends on how you understand homo: in Latin, 'homo'='man'; in Greek 'homo'='same'. |
|
#5
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
May I ask why you are opposed to marriage? And is that a personal choice, i.e. opposed to yourself ever getting married, or a judgement on marriage as an institution in general, for all people? (just curious, not judgmental)
__________________
I am who I am. I don't need labels to define me. They're sticky, and I hate the glue they leave behind.
|
|
#6
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
But of course, a lot of people do still get married and do live happy lives with those they do marry. Even within poly, there are a lot of married people here. If it works well for you, then there is no problem with it. I just can't see how it would give me anything I can't already have though.
__________________
[Insert witty comment here]
Feel free to add me up on facebook. - Just click here. Do send a message in your request saying who you are and that you're from this forum. It will help me filter out any spam requests. =] |
![]() |
| Tags |
| definition, definitions, description, descriptions |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|