without giving specific examples
It's his attitude, use of subtlety to slight people, what appears to be his belief that correct grammar rather than facts or the truth of what ever matter he claims to bring up to discuss however after antagonizing others in very indirect or round about ways he will dismiss the matter entirely. I am sure the tactics work for prep school or even ivy league debate team, but ignorance of facts, especially when it comes to science and provable matters he is actually nothing but the worst type of erudite, which is the ignorant kind.
The short version is due to his continued indirect slights then complete denial of such intentions, in my eyes he is a liar.
People like him who use seemingly logical thought processes in order to be "right" (meaning win a debate) but have no problem with using fabricated references to make claims that are far from facts and nowhere near truth can cause big problems for activists working on advancing issues of equal rights for all non-traditional people who as of yet have no rights whatsoever, even though they are guaranteed in the States by the Constitution.
Because of his is seemingly popular, which is very inflated due his actual popularity being only the number of those who agree with his view as opposed to the number of profile accounts, he has the potential to seriously harm all the work that has been done for equal rights which could cripple the movement for everyone including polies right as it begins to gain momentum. He uses misrepresented facts, pseudo-science (while at the same time touting to know the difference between his beliefs and real science) and out right lies backed up by fabricated sources. Because there is no reason to do so, because we can achieve equal rights not only for LGBT people and their families, but poly as well and the it can be done be sticking to the truth (in fact, truth is the quickest path to doing so because luckily these issues were explicitly written about by the Constitution of the United States)
Because the bullshit he often writes about has no reason behind it, other than to spite those who don't agree with it, it pisses me off that he would do so on topics that are or can be key issues in obtaining equal rights.
I have a go at him here, because it was a catch phrase here on this site that I wrote, and the entire post was deleted "on accident" or got caught up with the spam, then two days later showed up in an equally ignorant Republican Erudite's writing which had been supposedly written years ago, but had been edited to include what I had written, yet turned against the very politics I had written it for.
It is not so much Franklin F Veaux who I would like "a go" at, as much as it is those who are in the electronic publishing industry who have issues with me because of something they are butt hurt about that happened almost ten years ago. It isn't exactly rocket science that it takes to make stupid people look foolish publicly, even if they did control the every database connected to the web, there are only so many bullshit lies you can tell and have the databases verify false claims before the lies start coming back to bite you. Eventually the lies snowball and unless you are going to have an internet filled with nothing but bullshit and no real facts, you have to at some point begin to come clean or at the very least stop publishing newly minted lies. If they do not, they are either going to look really stupid or have databases that become useless because they are sources for only fabricated, false information. Which I guess would be great for a honeypot, but in general not a good idea