View Single Post
  #5  
Old 06-27-2011, 08:45 PM
ImaginaryIllusion's Avatar
ImaginaryIllusion ImaginaryIllusion is offline
Moderator
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Canada
Posts: 1,927
Default

I agree about the article being very interesting. It's a rather interesting notion of divorce being not-applicable to religious marriages putting a lot of monostream canadians in the crosshairs of s.293. I would have liked to see the author being around for representations during the court case.

Speaking of which, the running commentary on the court case in BC is here:

BC Reference Case on Polygamy and Group Marriages

We're still waiting on a verdict...and regardless of which way the finding goes, it's just the start.
__________________
“People who say it cannot be done should not interrupt those who are doing it.” - Chinese Proverb

-Imaginary Illusion

How did I get here & Where am I going?
Reply With Quote