View Single Post
  #47  
Old 05-13-2010, 06:41 PM
capricorny capricorny is offline
Member
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Sub-ultima Thule
Posts: 65
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by CielDuMatin View Post
As long as we're not trying to come up with some universal set of rules, foundations, paradigms and principles (whatever we choose to call them), then I am fine. I was starting to see some pretty broad generalisations and I don't think it behooves us to get into "the right way to do poly" territory.
So, then what is, in your view, wrong with Ariakas' suggestion

Quote:
love - check
ability to love multiple - check
trust/honesty - check
communication - check
my poly is not your poly - check
As far as I can see, the only disagreement is to whether something like balance(equity/symmetry should be added. Not as a testing criterion, as many seem to think, but as a basic principle - which it may seem some would think is unneccessary, as it is so obvious.
Reply With Quote