Originally Posted by jackrabbit
I looked at that post again and I don't really see that it is arguing against monogamy so much as pointing out that it is not a requirement. Now you have a point about the original title: "Monogamy: Residue From Centuries Past and Best Forgotten", so I edited it to drop the "and Best Forgotten".
I read it again as well, and I totally agree. I think the title alone gave me the impression right from the beginning that you were arguing against monogamy. The new title is much more inviting.