View Single Post
  #25  
Old 12-30-2009, 10:56 PM
lovefromgirl's Avatar
lovefromgirl lovefromgirl is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: The Great Soggy Northeast
Posts: 353
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Ravenesque View Post
Where I would be concerned here is whether civil unions are being given as a method to separate privileges once again. Marriage affords these privileges and civil unions don't. Then equality has not been given.
Hence why I wouldn't be comfortable with such a change until it became widely understood that a "marriage" in front of a justice of the peace, for example, is just a civil union. It's what my parents had and they're none the worse for it! I'd love it if that were the default understanding: that it's the piece of paper that makes it a legally binding union, not the religious/cultural ceremony.

Either we're all married or we all have civil unions, pretty much.

That would, of course, require America to become much more of a secular nation, and given current circumstances, I doubt it'll happen in the next fifty years, but a girl can hope.

[edited because this code is still veeeeery new to me!]
__________________
"I swear, if we live through this somebody's going to find their automatic shower preferences reprogrammed for ice water."

Refuge in Audacity { home of the post-raph stunner }
Reply With Quote