View Single Post
  #163  
Old 05-06-2012, 10:40 PM
River's Avatar
River River is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: NM, USA
Posts: 1,894
Default

QUOTE: "Where romantic people have an emotional need to be with another person in a romantic relationship, aromantics are often satisfied with friendships and other non-romantic relationships. What distinguishes romantic relationships from a non-romantic relationships can vary diversely, but often includes physical connection (holding hands, cuddling, etc.) and monogamous partnership.

[....]

People anywhere on the sexual spectrum (sexual, asexual, grey-A, etc.) may be aromantic."



from - http://www.asexuality.org/wiki/index...itle=Aromantic

=============

Thus the term "aromantic" (as defined here) is too vague to mean anything in particular. Surely it does not come down to whether one enjoys holding hands!

And I say this in part because the provided definition allows for both "sexuals" and "asexuals" to be aromantic, or romantic. So "romantic" isn't defined by sexual interest or practice in any way--as here defined. Nor is it defined in any way, really. It isn't defined by interest level, commitment level, passion level, or any discernable anything. Hmm.
__________________
bi, partnered, available

River's Blog

Last edited by River; 05-06-2012 at 10:43 PM.
Reply With Quote